Saturday, March 28, 2020
The Revolution In Cuba Was Not A Result Of Economic Deprivation, Nor B
  The revolution in Cuba was not a result of economic deprivation, nor because        of high expectations in the economy, it was the political factors and        expectations which evoked the civilians to revolt. The Cuban economy was        moving forward at the time before the rebellion but the dominant influence        of the sugar industry made the economy "assymetrical" and encouraged no        "dynamic industrial sector". Because of the dependance on sugar, the        unemployment rate ranged between 16 and 20% rising and falling with sugar        prices, ebbing and flowing as the season changed. The rural wage levels        were incredibly unsteady and unpredictable; the standard of living was low.        Dependance on the sugar industry did not retard the economy of Cuba, just        the wages of its workers. It was the leaders of the nation who reaped        profit from this dependance, and it was the leaders of the nation who        insisted on keeping the nation the way it was. By the mid 1950's, however,        the middle class had expanded to 33% of the population. Democracy, as we        know it, broke down: the large middle class did not assert democratic        leadership, there was no social militancy in the working class ranks, and        the people found order preferable to disarray. Batista could no longer        legitimize his regime . Failure in the elections of 1954 showed the        discontent of the people, and failure in communications with the United        States illustrated its discontent. Finally, opposing forces confronted        Batista's power: there were street protests, confrontations with the        police, assault, sabotage, and urban violence. This began the revolution        in Cuba.        ?        America, with its stubborn ideas and misjudgements of character, forced        Castro to turn to the Soviets for alliance and aid. When Castro visited        the United States in April, 1959, there were different respected        individuals holding different views of him and his future actions. Nixon        believed Castro to be naive, some others thought him a welcome change from        Batista, still others called him an "immature but effective leader, without        a well formed view of how to lead a revolutionary movement and not overly        concerned with abstract of philosophical matters" (p. 55). Why, then, did        the United States impress nit-picky ideals like "there should not be        communists in the Army or in labor", or "Cuba's approach to the Batista        trials is totally unacceptable, too casual, too nonchalant" on this        "forming" leader? Castro was like an inexperienced murderer with a gun in        his hand: any rustle in the background could set off his nervous trigger        finger causing death, destruction, and liaisons with the U.S.S.R. When        America expressed dislike of the trial procedures Castro was holding, of        course he (Castro) would try to prove he was able to run his country by        himself and snub the U.S. ambassador. The United States had so much        invested in Cuba that it was stupid to think that Cuba could not retaliate        when the U.S. cut off sugar imports. America was just too sure of itself        thinking it could get away with criticism and acts like that when an        "immature" leader was in control. Cuba was not totally dependant on the        United States and proved itself so. If Cuba could not find help and        support in America, it sought elsewhere for those who smiled on its actions        and ideals. Castro found friends in Russia; the United States made this        so.        ?        Succeeding and failing have alot to do with judgement. For the United        States, the revolution was a failure because the result was a communist        nation in the Carribean. For the revolutionarie s in Cuba, the revolution        accomplished many of their goals: capitalism was abolished and socialism        installed eroding class distinctions and eliminating private property, the        working conditions improved, women's rights improved, labor unions were        recogniz ed, the military became more modern and advanced, political order        was restored, the status of the country improved from dependant to        independant, and many more. For the people of Cuba, therefore, the        revolution can be viewed as a success (if communism ca n be seen as        acceptable), but for America, the result was a failure.        ?        Latin America is one of the poorest and underdeveloped sections of the        world. Because of this fact, it is difficult for its nations to compete and        thrive in the world market with modern nations as they struggle to        industrialize and improve their status. Capitalism, as a basis for an        economy, means that each man has to struggle to make a living, that each        man may fail and starve, and that each man may get a lucky break and        thrive. We saw this struggle of the lower classes clearly in Mexico during        their industrialization. With communism, a man    
Saturday, March 7, 2020
When ledgends die essays
When ledgends die essays    In the book When the Legends Die by Hal Borland, Tom is     influenced by many people and their ideas. As his settings change,     new things influence him to change his personality. The three     main influences on Tom are his mother Bessie, Red Dillon and     	His biggest influence out of everyone would be his mother     Bessie. She taught Tom about the old ways, how to fish, chant and     weave baskets. Basically she  him everything he knows. As well as     teaching Tom all these things she taught him to be self sufficient.     Eventhough she had 13 years with her son, she gave him a belief     in his indian ways  that would come back again later on in his life.     At the end of this novel when he goes back to the old ways, it's     really a way for him to thank her for everything she provided him     with. He really found himself at the end of the novel and found his     	Red Dillon was the total opposite of Bessie. He made him     forget about where he was from and his goals for life. He pushed     Tom farther away from his history. He also got him to cheat and     drink. Tom knew these things were wrong but it stayed in his     routine. Red tested Tom to his fullest and pushed Tom to work     harder. Unfortunatley Red did not work quite as hard as Tom and     even got Tom to set a deadfall on one of his rides. When he was     living with the white man he was getting used to the white peoples     ways all the while losing site of his Ute history.		     	Mary Redmond who was another of Tom's influences played     a big role in encouraging Toms to change his ideas about life in     general. She was the one looking over him wile he was staying in     the hospital. She was the only person that was in the hospital who     truly cared for him. He knew she meant well but he was scared to     ask her for help because he had been let down so many times     before in his life. She changed his thinking on what he was going     to do when he go out of the hospital. At  first     ...     
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
